Recent Episodes

Nathan and Ben weigh in on the reports from some test-takers that the February LSAT featured more LG-style questions in Logical Reasoning.

Nathan and Ben outline their plan of attack in Logical Reasoning.

Nathan and Ben discuss how to predict answers and what to do when your prediction doesn’t appear in the answer choices.

Nathan and Ben examine a low-ranked law school that reduces roughly two-thirds of its conditional scholarships every year.

Nathan and Ben criticize the obfuscation of scholarship data in ABA 509 reports.

Ben and Nathan highlight the importance of timed practice and how to manage negative emotions from practice test scores.

Ben and Nathan criticize schools that mislead pre-law students about their law-school prospects.

Ben and Nathan insist that any downsides to retaking the LSAT are negligible, while the upsides can be life-changing.

Nathan and Ben dig into newly released admissions data and discuss the impact of the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ban.

Ben and Nathan urge listeners to read like lawyers: every word matters.

Some law schools might soon bypass the ABA’s admission test requirement, allowing them to admit more students without LSAT scores.

Ben and Nathan examine the admissions statistics and bar passage rate at Cooley Law School.

Nathan and Ben urge listeners to stop overthinking their study schedules and to start doing LSAT questions.

Nathan and Ben demonstrate a three-step process for objecting to an argument that confuses correlation for causation.

The only reliable way to get faster on the LSAT is by slowing down and solving one question at a time.